Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mod Murmur"

From Mumble Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with 'While the idea of having separate documentation for the channel viewer protocol is good, I do not think the mislabeled "direct" approach should be mentioned here. It is a very ug…')
 
(sign)
Line 1: Line 1:
While the idea of having separate documentation for the channel viewer protocol is good, I do not think the mislabeled "direct" approach should be mentioned here. It is a very ugly hack depending on exposing the server's database file to the world, thus providing neither current information nor any kind of security. If you want to retrieve server information, use the Ice interface together with one of the CVP providers, or make solid proposals towards an alternative as has already been discussed.
+
While the idea of having separate documentation for the channel viewer protocol is good, I do not think the mislabeled "direct" approach should be mentioned here. It is a very ugly hack depending on exposing the server's database file to the world, thus providing neither current information nor any kind of security. If you want to retrieve server information, use the Ice interface together with one of the CVP providers, or make solid proposals towards an alternative as has already been discussed. [[User:Ngollan|Ngollan]] 09:13, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:13, 25 July 2011

While the idea of having separate documentation for the channel viewer protocol is good, I do not think the mislabeled "direct" approach should be mentioned here. It is a very ugly hack depending on exposing the server's database file to the world, thus providing neither current information nor any kind of security. If you want to retrieve server information, use the Ice interface together with one of the CVP providers, or make solid proposals towards an alternative as has already been discussed. Ngollan 09:13, 25 July 2011 (UTC)